Most books say don’t give in or they will learn to use crying as a technique to get everything they want. They may try I don’t doubt it but does it have to come to the crying in the first place? Sometimes parents create those situation for the child to learn that they cannot have everything. Who says so? Just because children want things does not mean they need this thing in particular. And again, why does it have to come to this in the first place? Why do children want “everything”?
There are two sides to it. One side is the material side. Children ask for toys, sweet whatever when they pass them I supermarkets. I don’t doubt that they do, my children do ask, too. But it is the reaction to a NO that matters. Sometimes, they get whatever they want, because I get myself what I want and sometimes I have no money and I cant buy it then as I sometimes cant buy things myself. So we are on equal terms. My NOs are honest and they understand.
They may not like it, who does like a NO especially if you were looking forward to something. Children do react this way if they know they get the attention they need from us, the parents regardless. They do not even need to do something marvellous and appraisable, they get it anyway.
There is a little story. A man comes home from New York after 4 weeks. His mind is still full of thoughts and he hardly acknowledge his wife. No kisses, no hugs, no sex. The wife wonders why not, does he not like her anymore? After the first night, she gets even worried. Husbands went to work this morning and comes home the evening. Again, no hugs, no kisses, no sex. The wife really gets worried now. She asked her husband to go somewhere with her, so she organises something for the weekend. He just says yes to please her. So the weekend comes and still, no real affections. Husband and wife walk along the main street towards a pub. On the way the wife sees something in the jewellery shop. She asked her husband if she can have it and feeling guilty her husband buys the ring. She feels loved again, she bought her a token. So what would that say about children? Children, who do not get attention/love when needed, when parents work or are otherwise distracted in their home, they will have the “need” to ask for a love token. Children who are loved and appreciated (and I am not talking about our intentions) will have no such need. They may still want things but they are easily settled if they cannot get it. I sometimes find my daughter saying that she wants this or that. We can talk about what she likes and why she likes it but that is about it. It does not necessarily means she WANTS it right now.
The other side of wanting everything is love and attentions. Most parents more or unconsciously make time tables when to give children love and attention and most of all time. This is called “quality time” and it suits the parents in the first place. Children will enjoy it, too. But why does it have to be times and measured? Children are different; they need love and attention at different times. So if you have two, they have different needs and those needs should be met differently. Each child should be taken differently. So “quality time” is again a method one uses (because the books tells them that) to give the child the attention and love they need to thrive. But love and attention should be given whenever it is needed and not be timed on a timetable. If I need a hug now and don’t really want to wait until 9 at night either. In using a timetable for this, we create a life that is far from natural but mostly pleases the parents. Or they use attention such as praise and/or the withdrawal of attention/love such as ignoring on the child’s behaviour either to get them to do something good again and again or to stop them from something “bad”. But why do we use attention in such a way? Why do children have to proof that they deserve love? We have love for everyone else without them to do something that pleases us. So why do we not have love for our children? And why do we stop at some stage of our children’s lives to meet their needs? Is it fear of them being spoilt? But how can we expect children to be lovable and give all the love and affection back. I only know one friend who is able to do that and I am amazed with that every time.
But overall the most important thing is not to lose oneself in the process of raising children. Not to play a role to achieve something. On the contrary be yourself and show children that it is ok to be yourself, not be afraid of being yourself. Children learn from what they see, not from what you tell them. And mostly most things we want children to do, we do not do ourselves. So we are sending mixed messages anyway. If we are happy with ourselves, we will be confident in raising our children simply be living the life and take every day in as it comes. If we are not happy with ourselves we have to change whatever it is that bothers us about ourselves
Besides, giving in is nothing bad either. It is funny, when children are stubborn we usually use the term “trying to get their own will”. When adults are stubborn, its called “being consequent”. Why is it accepted for adults to try to get their will and not for children? Children do what they see. So when we give in, down the years children will give in to. It cannot be predicted and there is no need to do so but it is still better to act naturally and be authentic than trying to pretend someone you are not. There is not much positive learning for children in it, if parents try to act out a role. And it is not really a giving it, it is the skill children learned to give and take.
Last thing is that the danger situation. Especially if there is danger around the corner or right there and you as the adult can see it, be authentic and act on it. Its impulsive anyway. Its also honest. So my advise is be yourself, be honest, be a guide but do not push your point, share your information. The only person one can change is oneself.